Tax Strategy Blog

2025 LLC Deductions

Contact Us

OBBBA • Bonus depreciation timing • 174 R&E fix • 199A sunset • SALT gross receipts

LLC Tax Planning & Deduction Strategies: a 2025 playbook for liquidity, leverage, and compliance

The 2025 tax year is not “business as usual.” New federal incentives (and their transition rules) create winners and losers based on timing, accounting methods, and documentation. This guide distills the highest-impact levers for LLC owners—especially capital spending, R&D recovery, QBI planning, retirement sheltering, and SALT defense. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

Educational overview only — not legal/tax advice.

Contents

  1. Entity structure: LLC vs S-Corp (2025 lens)
  2. Accounting method + timing (cash vs accrual)
  3. Depreciation revolution: bonus + 179 + vehicles + QPP
  4. Section 174: domestic R&E expensing restored + retroactive relief
  5. 199A/QBI: thresholds, SSTB traps, and 2026 sunset risk
  6. Operational deductions: Augusta Rule, kids, meals, home office
  7. Retirement planning: Solo 401(k) advantage
  8. SALT: gross receipts realities (WA B&O case study)
  9. Compliance: CTA/BOI posture in late 2025

1) Structure optimization: LLC vs S-Corp in 2025

LLCs remain tax “chameleons,” but 2025 shifts the decision variables: payroll tax ceilings, QBI thresholds, and the administrative cost of running payroll + filing 1120-S. For many owners, an S-election only makes sense when net income is consistently high enough to justify a defensible salary/distribution split. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

2) Accounting method + timing: your baseline tax lever

Cash vs accrual isn’t bookkeeping preference—it’s tax timing power. Under the cash method, year-end planning is about (a) deferring income and (b) accelerating expenses, including prepaid items under the 12-month rule. In 2025, timing matters even more because of the bonus depreciation “split-year” effect. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

3) Depreciation revolution: the January 19, 2025 “two-period” year

The report highlights a critical timing rule: 100% bonus depreciation is restored, but eligibility hinges on assets being acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025—creating a “January glitch” where early-January purchases may only receive the reduced transitional bonus rate. The recommended play is to stack deductions: use Section 179 first (especially for “Period A” assets), then apply 100% bonus depreciation for post-Jan 19 placements. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

Vehicles: passenger auto vs heavy SUV

Vehicle deductions remain high-audit and highly technical. Passenger autos face strict caps; heavy SUVs/trucks (over 6,000 lbs GVWR) are treated differently, and post-Jan 19 bonus depreciation can dramatically change the first-year write-off economics. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}

Qualified Production Property (QPP)

The report flags new/expanded incentives aimed at manufacturing property, creating potentially massive recovery acceleration for qualifying facility investments—with specific date windows and eligibility constraints. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}

4) Section 174: domestic R&E expensing is back (and 2022–2024 may be fixable)

For software/engineering-heavy LLCs, Section 174 drove “phantom income” from 2022–2024. The report explains that domestic R&E is again immediately deductible for tax years beginning after 12/31/2024, and highlights transition pathways for prior years: eligible small businesses may amend returns, or taxpayers may use an accounting method change (Form 3115) to pick up remaining unamortized costs via a Section 481(a) adjustment. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}

Decision framing: amend vs 3115

Amending can generate refunds (cash now). A 3115 change can create a large 2025 deduction “wave” that wipes out current-year taxable income. The best option is cash-flow dependent and interacts with state conformity. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}

5) 199A/QBI: optimize now, plan for a 2026 cliff

The QBI deduction remains a cornerstone for pass-through planning in 2025, with thresholds and phase-outs that are especially punishing for SSTBs at higher income levels. The report also emphasizes sunset risk after 12/31/2025—meaning 2025 may be the last year for certain planning moves to “lock in” lower effective rates, depending on future legislation. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}

6) S-election planning: reasonable comp is the audit frontier

S-Corp elections can reduce self-employment taxes, but only if reasonable compensation is defensible. The report stresses that heuristic “splits” are risky and that 2025 enforcement is increasingly data-driven—favoring documented market-rate approaches based on duties and comparable wage data. :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}

7) Operational deductions: small levers that add up

Augusta Rule (280A(g))

Rent your home to your business for up to 14 days/year for legitimate business use—deductible to the business, tax-free to the owner—if priced at market rates and documented with meeting minutes. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}

Hiring children (income shifting)

Paying children for legitimate work can shift income into low brackets; certain structures may also reduce payroll taxes. This is documentation-heavy (W-2s, job descriptions, time logs, market-rate pay). :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}

Meals, entertainment, and home office

The report reinforces 2025’s baseline: business meals are generally 50% deductible; entertainment remains non-deductible; and the home office deduction depends on exclusive and regular business use (simplified vs actual methods). :contentReference[oaicite:13]{index=13}

8) Retirement planning: Solo 401(k) tends to dominate

Retirement plans are often the largest “clean” deduction lever. The report compares Solo 401(k) vs SEP IRA, highlighting higher effective contribution potential (employee deferral + employer contribution) and new catch-up enhancements for ages 60–63 under SECURE 2.0. :contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}

9) SALT defense: gross receipts regimes can dominate your cash flow

Federal incentives may improve after-tax liquidity, but states can claw it back—especially gross receipts tax states that ignore profit. The report uses Washington’s B&O regime as a case study (including rate and threshold mechanics) to illustrate why top-line taxes can punish high-volume, low-margin businesses. :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}

10) Compliance: CTA / BOI reporting posture in late 2025

The report summarizes the Corporate Transparency Act environment with ongoing litigation uncertainty and evolving FinCEN guidance, while emphasizing that filing obligations and deadlines still matter as a practical compliance risk-management step. :contentReference[oaicite:16]{index=16}

Bottom line

A winning 2025 plan is a coordinated stack: optimize entity posture, choose the right accounting timing, time capex around the Jan 19 rule, fix 174 the right way (refund vs 2025 super-deduction), protect 199A while it exists, and don’t let SALT regimes blindside cash flow. :contentReference[oaicite:17]{index=17}